home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- davewarner@globalone.net wrote:
- : JVG (jvg@netcom.com) wrote:
-
- : : I would like to request recommendations fro those who have already been
- : : through this. Don't get me wrong, I'm doing my home work - I'm pretty
- : : familiar with the currently available HW/SW, I read the magazines, and
- : : follow the pc-clone groups on Usenet. It's just that experience is the
- : : best teacher, and perhaps those of you that have been through this could
- : : share yours with those of us who haven't.
-
-
- : Have you considered getting a workstation instead of a PC clone? I was all
- : gung-ho about getting a PC for a couple of months, but when I saw how much
- : the prices were dropping on DEC Alpha workstations, I changed my mind. I'd
- : love to get a Raptor 3 workstation, but the pricetag is just a bit too steep
- : for me...so now I'm leaning towards a TeraClipse workstation by Bushey
- : Virtual Construction....they have a 166mhz 21066 Alpha system with 16megs
- : ram, 540meg hard drive, 17" monitor, Quad-Speed CD-Rom, WindowsNT, and many
- : other extras for $3,995. Add $650 for 32megs...or (the system I'm leaning
- : toward) add $2,100 for 64megs of RAM. They'll also have a 233mhz Alpha 21066
- : chip available soon for an extra $300. So, for about $6,500 you can get a
- : machine that's probably 4-5 times faster than a P90 clone, which will cost
- : you about $5,000 for the same specs...not a huge price difference there!
-
- : Has anyone purchased a TeraClipse workstation yet? I know they were at the
- : NAB show and I've received a lot of info from them, but I'm just curious if
- : anyone's actually gotten their hands on one of these machines yet???
-
- : --
- : -David Warner
- : Event Horizon Graphics
- :
-
- I generally aggree with what David has said about 'work-stations'. A couple of
- things should be pointed out here though. First, the 21066 Alpha AXP chip, from
- what I've heard, does not have as fast a floating point unit as the 21064 chip
- being used in the more current generation of Alpha machines. And since ray-tracing
- is such a floating point intensive application that should be considered. Second,
- while Alpha AXP based machines are very fast at what they do, they don't do as much.
- There simply is not as much software available for them as Intel based machines.
- If your primary use for the machine is Lightwave 3D fine, but if you want to use
- the thousands of other apps out there for Intel base processors you may be out of
- luck, or you may have to wait for a port.
-
- Now don't get me wrong, I bought an 275Mhz Alpha AXP machine from Aspen Systems
- and am very happy with it as a Lightwave, WinImages F/X workstation. But I also
- own and use a Pentium based machine because of all the useful software and hardware.
-
- Dave Paige
- davep@access.digex.net
-
-
-
-
-